feat: initial commit - opencode spec-driven development boilerplate
Converted from Claude Code boilerplate to opencode: - CLAUDE.md -> AGENTS.md (opencode instructions) - .claude/settings.json -> opencode.json (permissions schema) - .claude/agents/ -> .opencode/agent/ (subagents with mode: subagent) - .claude/commands/ -> .opencode/command/ (slash commands with ) - .claude/skills/ -> .opencode/skills/ (7 skills, removed allowed-tools) - DevContainer updated to install opencode - All .claude/ paths and Claude Code references updated
This commit is contained in:
64
.opencode/command/review-docs.md
Normal file
64
.opencode/command/review-docs.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Run a detailed document review using a subagent
|
||||
agent: build
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Document Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Document path**: `$ARGUMENTS` (e.g. `/review-docs docs/product-requirements.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Run
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
opencode
|
||||
> /review-docs docs/product-requirements.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Procedure
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Verify the Document Exists
|
||||
|
||||
Check whether the specified document exists.
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Launch the doc-reviewer Subagent
|
||||
|
||||
Launch the doc-reviewer subagent to run the review:
|
||||
|
||||
Use the Task tool to launch the doc-reviewer subagent:
|
||||
- subagent_type: "doc-reviewer"
|
||||
- description: "Document detailed review"
|
||||
- prompt: "Please review $ARGUMENTS in detail.\n\nEvaluate it from the following perspectives:\n1. Completeness: Are all required items included?\n2. Specificity: Are there any ambiguous expressions?\n3. Consistency: Is it consistent with other documents?\n4. Measurability: Are success metrics measurable? (for a PRD)\n\nPlease produce a review report."
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Summarize the Review Results
|
||||
|
||||
Extract the key points from the review report produced by the subagent and report them to the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Document Review Results
|
||||
|
||||
## Document: [file name]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
1. [Improvement 1] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
2. [Improvement 2] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
3. [Improvement 3] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Rating
|
||||
|
||||
[1-5]/5
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Actions
|
||||
|
||||
- [Recommended action 1]
|
||||
- [Recommended action 2]
|
||||
|
||||
For the full report, refer to the subagent's output.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- The review involves detailed analysis and may take a few minutes.
|
||||
- The subagent runs in an independent context, so it does not consume the main agent's context.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user