Ken Yasue
a579d90113
- New commands: /define-design, /update-design, /generate-app (web | flutter | winui3) - New skills: ui-design, design-tokens, platform-ui-generation - /add-feature: check design spec before implementation (Step 3.5) and reconcile all six persistent docs after implementation (Step 8) - /setup-project: automatic document creation with self-check checkpoints - CLAUDE.md: document docs/design/, .claude/ configuration, and the design phase in the development process - Enrich subagent descriptions; allowlist new skills in settings.json - Add docs/design/README.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Run a detailed document review using a subagent
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Document Review
|
|
|
|
**Document path**: `$ARGUMENTS` (e.g. `/review-docs docs/product-requirements.md`)
|
|
|
|
## How to Run
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
claude
|
|
> /review-docs docs/product-requirements.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Procedure
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Verify the Document Exists
|
|
|
|
Check whether the specified document exists.
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Launch the doc-reviewer Subagent
|
|
|
|
Launch the doc-reviewer subagent to run the review:
|
|
|
|
Use the Task tool to launch the doc-reviewer subagent:
|
|
- subagent_type: "doc-reviewer"
|
|
- description: "Document detailed review"
|
|
- prompt: "Please review $ARGUMENTS in detail.\n\nEvaluate it from the following perspectives:\n1. Completeness: Are all required items included?\n2. Specificity: Are there any ambiguous expressions?\n3. Consistency: Is it consistent with other documents?\n4. Measurability: Are success metrics measurable? (for a PRD)\n\nPlease produce a review report."
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Summarize the Review Results
|
|
|
|
Extract the key points from the review report produced by the subagent and report them to the user.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# Document Review Results
|
|
|
|
## Document: [file name]
|
|
|
|
### Key Improvements
|
|
|
|
1. [Improvement 1] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
|
2. [Improvement 2] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
|
3. [Improvement 3] (Priority: High/Medium/Low)
|
|
|
|
### Overall Rating
|
|
|
|
[1-5]/5
|
|
|
|
### Next Actions
|
|
|
|
- [Recommended action 1]
|
|
- [Recommended action 2]
|
|
|
|
For the full report, refer to the subagent's output.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- The review involves detailed analysis and may take a few minutes.
|
|
- The subagent runs in an independent context, so it does not consume the main agent's context.
|